Through a Holland Mountain system improvement project, we assess the current setup, looking for gaps in system configuration, reports, business processes and governance. We speak to business users to get direct feedback on what is and isn’t working for them. We benchmark the firm’s use of the system against best practice and produce an action plan to remediate and optimise the system, maximising its potential benefits.
In this article, we outline 4 common issues that we find and explain how we fix them.
Issue 1: Poor data quality
The most common system issue that we find is poor-quality data. When a system was implemented, the firm may have just done a ‘lift and shift’ of data from a previous system, with limited data cleansing or enrichment. Or, they may have started with high-quality data, but not had the data governance roles & processes in place to maintain it.
How we fix this:
|
Issue 2: Lack of continuous improvement
Some firms take systems ‘out-of-the-box’, without tailoring them to fit the nuances of their organisation, to get up and running as quickly as possible. Others spend significant time tailoring systems to their needs during the implementation, but stop new configuration once it goes live. With business needs constantly evolving, a system that is not continuously improved will quickly become out of date.
The common result of both of these scenarios is that business users feel the system doesn’t work for them and they stop using it, reverting to their former ways of working.
How we fix this:
|
Issue 3: Over-complicated configuration
Some firms try to do too much in phase 1, increasing the scope during the implementation, rather than first getting users comfortable running basic processes in the system. This is especially problematic if users are being asked to adopt new businesses processes alongside new technology.
Poor change control can also result in over-complication, with too many people inputting changes without consideration of best practice or downstream impacts. This quickly causes issues, making the system difficult to use and maintain.
How we fix this:
|
Issue 4: Lack of buy in from the business
The root cause of system issues is often a lack of business buy-in, causing reluctance to change ways of working to adopt the new system. This is typically the result of:
-
-
A lack of senior sponsorship of the system
-
A lack of change management during the implementation
-
The business not having felt consulted in the system selection process
-
The benefits and business case for the change never having been communicated.
-
For an implementation to be successful, it is vital to have senior business leaders regularly communicating the benefits of the system to their teams, explaining how the system fits in with the firm’s strategy, and championing its use from the top.
How we fix this:
|
If you have a system that is not adding enough value today, get in touch with our team to find out more.
As Holland Mountain’s Head of Consulting, Jeremy oversees all consulting projects and leads our team of specialist consultants. Jeremy also drives Holland Mountain’s COO/CTO Practice, supporting operational leaders to establish the people, processes, technology & data capabilities they need to achieve their strategic objectives. Jeremy and his team have delivered operational strategy work for over 40 of the leading Private Capital firms globally.